Showing posts with label the sixties. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the sixties. Show all posts

Andy Warhol: A Documentary Film (2006) Review

Andy Warhol: A Documentary Film (2006)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
This is the best portrait of an artist I've ever seen. I was completely entralled by the film. Because Warhol was both tremendously inventive and horribly cruel, I alternately felt a sense of awe and disgust. Warhol's genius and callousness are both fleshed out. Despite the turbulent content of the film, I was simply exhilerated throughout.
Having watched this excellent film, I feel a greatly enriched appreciation for Warhol's art---a sense of what it said, how it worked, and how it became a cliche. (I was particularly ill-informed about Warhol's films, which were discussed in great detail.)
The Factory--where Warhol worked (but seldom played) and where transvestites, drifters, and creative spirits intermingled--is featured in healthy portions. This locale comes across as one of those rare places in history where the geist of a era is spatially concentrated. Here, in this one extraordinary place of production, Warhol and others fomented art and a vision of a post-Fordist world. This film is essential viewing (like the Weather Underground or Berkeley in the Sixties) for those who want to ingest and comprehend the paradigm shift of the "1960s."
Warhol's cruel indifference to the self-destruction of those around him is critically revealed. While some in the Factory drank and drugged themselves to death, Warhol passively watches, always remaining cool, detached, and voyeuristic.
The attempted homicide on Warhol, his commercialism, and his later years are all mentioned. I would fault the film for not showing Warhol speak on film more often, for not really considering his cooptation by capitalism, and for skipping over his influence in art and in popular society.
I must admit though, that the film is brilliantly executed, and well worth your time and nickel.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Andy Warhol: A Documentary Film (2006)

"He was the most American of artists and the most artistic of Americans," one man later said – "so American in fact that he is almost invisible to us."ANDY WARHOL – a riveting and often deeply moving film portrait of the most famous and famously controversial artist of the second half of the twentieth century – is the first to explore the complete spectrum of Warhol's astonishing artistic output, stretching across five decades from the late 1940's to his untimely death in 1987.Combining powerful on-camera interviews and rare still and motion picture footage, it is also the first to put Warhol himself – his humble family background and formative experiences in Pittsburgh, and his crucial apprenticeship as a commercial artist in New York – back into the presentation of his life.

Buy NowGet 20% OFF

Click here for more information about Andy Warhol: A Documentary Film (2006)

Read More...

The Haight-Ashbury: A History Review

The Haight-Ashbury: A History
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
> "The Bay area Vortex," is what some insiders called the Haight-Ashbury district during the hippy revolution. The area was a whirlpool that attracted psychedelic drugs and druggies, hippies, politicos, and soon-to-be famous bands, among other American oddities.
Bob Dylan, The Grateful Dead, Jefferson Airplane and the Hell's Angels could be found at dance-hall scenes lit by psychedelic light shows. It was a two-year span, from 1964 to 1966, of acid, Timothy Leary and the Vietnam War. Song lyrics held secret and not so secret messages of drugs and protest. "It was the best of times; it was the worst of times," as Dickens would say.
The Haight-Ashbury: A History starts out a little slow, especially if you are not familiar with that time and place in history. Perry was an insider of the happenings during the, "summer of love," as Bob Weir of the Grateful Dead calls the two-year span, and Perry knows vernacular of the time and place which is much like a foreign language to those of us who are uninformed. He knows the names, businesses, bands, people and the happenings. If all this is news to you, it's a little hard to trudge through this information and make sense of it.
But, if you remember the period, or are curious about the drug culture of the 60s, or if the history of rock bands intrigues you, this is definitely a book for you. There is a 71-page section where Perry writes a journal of the events that happened April through October of 1967. Local police were getting tough on drugs; residents of the Haight were tiring of tour busses full of people invading their space. The darker side of the Haight was emerging. I found this one section to be an interesting essay on society in general.
Toward the book's end, Perry ties the Haight-Ashbury events with what was happening and what had happened around the world and understanding of the "Bay area Vortex," becomes clearer. I went back and reread the opening chapters that seemed confusing at first, but now they made sense. Despite the, " . . .bitterest disappointments and most violent disruption, . . ." noted, Perry ends the book with an uplifting message and uses the history of Haight-Ashbury as an example of a Phoenix that arises from the ashes. An intriguing concept.
Sixteen pages of black and white photographs will bring memories of the events and people to the minds of those who saw this time. For those who are just learning about the era the photographs make the message clearer. You can see a young Jefferson Airplane and Grateful Dead. Timothy Leary shows a faint smile for the photographer and George Harrison is surrounded by admirers on Hippie Hill, August 7, 1967. Samples of the clothes, the art and the hair abound.
Educated at Princeton University and the University of California, Berkeley, Perry followed the psychedelic subculture from 1965 until 1968, when he applied for a job at the Rolling Stone Magazine. Later, he became interested in the history of Middle Eastern food and is now an internationally known authority on this subject.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Haight-Ashbury: A History

2005 marks the 40th anniversary of San Franciscos Haight-Ashbury district. The psychedelic community was probably the most widely written-about phenomenon of the 1960s apart from the Vietnam War. As unexpected as it was inevitable, the whole eventfrom public manifestation to gaudy collapsehappened in less than two years. In this acclaimed, definitive work, Charles Perry examines the history, the drama, and the energy of counter-cultures defining moment. First published by Rolling Stone Press in 1984 and now re-releasedwith a new introduction by the Grateful Deads Bob Weirto time with Haight-Ashburys 40th anniversary, this highly acclaimed work is a must-have for anyone interested in the original sex, drugs, and rock n roll lifestyle.

Buy Now

Click here for more information about The Haight-Ashbury: A History

Read More...

Hippie Review

Hippie
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)

Hippie is a glossy coffee table book covering the rise and demise of the counterculture during the years from 1965 to 1971. For those who lived through the era, the full-page photos are bound to get some synapses firing (presumably bypassing all those drug-damaged neural junctions). This is essentially a People magazine version of the sixties: lots of breathless headlines and celebrity photos. Writer Barry Miles has dug up some good music gossip, including not very flattering John Lennon anecdotes.
Some serious issues of the era get raised - Vietnam, civil rights, woman's liberation, gay rights - but in a, well, glossy coffee-table-book way. The editorial difficulty in putting together a book of this sort is deciding whether you're celebrating sex, drugs and rock and roll or chronicling a culture in crisis.
The young people in America rose up in mass revulsion against Jell-O molds and tract homes with bomb shelters in the back yard. They hit the road looking for something more optimistic and more fun. Enormous energy went in to trying to alter or bring down the dominant culture. In the civil rights and antiwar movements, people were literally putting their lives on the line. People's "lifestyle choices," as we now call them, had profound repercussions, personally and politically, in ways unimaginable to young people today (soldiers in Iraq excepted). Similar upheavals were happening in Europe, especially France, where the student - worker alliance only dreamed of in the US actually came to pass in the heady spring of 68.
You can get a good debate going by asking which specific event signified the end of the sixties in America. Was it Kent State, where the Ohio National Guard gunned down four student protesters? Altamont, where the peace and love culture broke down on its own without any outside interference? The breakup of the Beatles? Or, even earlier, Nixon's election in 68, which demonstrated the difficulty of changing hearts and minds in America? Barry Miles covers them all here, so you can make up your own mind.
But America has a genius for absorbing new ideas into its vast, spongy middle. Hippie notions of casual sex, recreational drug use, and quirky personal style seeped into suburban living rooms, stripped of any cultural or political critique. In the 1970s, the revolution was not only televised, but merchandised, and the momentum had for sure crested and started to recede. On the plus side, protests at the Miss America pageant led by a tortuous route to housewives in Sioux Falls filling cubicles at insurance and credit card companies. African Americans got access to academia and began moving up the economic ladder. George W. Bush notwithstanding, we work harder to prevent industries from poisoning our air and water.
But there was a time, my children, when hope hung in the air, and personal liberation was a radiant promise. All you had to do was stare out at the future with the right kind of eyes. Clearly the old structures would topple, and gleaming new edifices of our own making would rise to replace them. The apocalyptic change didn't happen, but whether you were partying or protesting, it was a grand time to be alive. Hippie, for all its slickness, is a great memory jogger for those who participated and not a bad introduction for those who missed out on the Age of Aquarius.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Hippie



Buy Now

Click here for more information about Hippie

Read More...

A Fiction of the Past: The Sixties in American History Review

A Fiction of the Past: The Sixties in American History
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Come one, come all and see before your very eyes how the 60s lives, once again! This book is for anyone who either missed or misunderstood the origins of discontent that led to the radical 60s in America.
This book is not heavy reading. Cavallo masterfully locates the roots of American counterculture in 1950's child-rearing and popular culture as well as specific historical movements of the late 18th and the 19th century that made this brand of radicalism clearly American. Cavallo begins with an examination of popular child-rearing practices that he terms "the cult of security." The "cult of security" is, in part, a blend of post World War II parental determination to build character in their children based on a love of independence and fierce determination to succeed. This was a mid 20th century secular version of the 19th century Protestant struggle with individual "free will" and the external constraints of God's Kingdom here on earth. But what has this to do with social, cultural and political rebellion in the 1960s?
Cavallo points out that in order to rebel against traditional forms of authority (SDS), to reconsider the structure and functions of the family (communes), and to reject mainstream art and music (rock & roll and street theater) is not to be accomplished by the faint of heart. For this kind of self-disolving and self evolving activity, character formation in childhood and early adolescence requires a blend of parental love, a demand for independent thinking and a fierce determination to achieve success. This is the stuff of strong ego formation-the glue that cemented a rebellious spirit to the harsh demands of emotional and physical participation in social unrest. Even that icon of moral childhood socialization, Walt Disney, reinforced this emerging independent spirit through none other than Jimminy Cricket who exhorted all children whao were watching to "always let your conscience be your guide." Some cartoon, heh. Ironically, while parents never wavered in their determination to provide updated soldiers for capitalism harnessing their children's independent spirit to hard work ala Bill Gates, what they got instead was sex, drugs and rock & roll in the persons of Timothy Leary, Jimmy Hendrix and Jerry Rubin! Trust Cavallo on this one, this was not what mom and pop had in mind.
Cavallo's deft touch weaves together a tapestry of popular imagery from Parents Magazine, television's Marlboro Man and non-fiction from the Organization man to The Female Eunuch to disclose the soul of a new American manhood and feminism-- a transition from "McCarthyism" to the underbelly of "Camelot," 60s radicalism. Where other writers serve up moral platitudes and half baked opinions tagging 60s radicalism as naive, bizarre or a communist plot, Cavallo sheds light on how close the rebellion of youth was to mainstream values and cultural antecedents in the late 18th and the 19th century.
Cavallo, for example, links rock & roll and street theater to mainstream values of hard work and professionalism. This synthesis would have even been tough for G.W. Hegel, but Cavallo succeeds nevertheless. In fascinating chapters that read like a tour guide, Cavallo takes us on a "trip" down a San Francisco street where we encounter the "Diggers," the pied pipers of street theater and street games. Stopping traffic, they hold up a big picture frame right in front of you to provide you with a "new frame of reference." Or walk with Cavallo into one of the Diggers "free" stores in Haight Asbury where, by definition, stealing is impossible. By the time that Abby Hoffman would write, "Steal This Book," the Diggers had already "been there, done that" nearly a decade before. In fact, these Shakespeare of the streets according to Cavallo, were even branded as too weird and excluded by more practical political rebels like the SDS. Did he say "practical"?
Cavallo reserves his best insight for the chapter on Rock & Work. Unlike their popular image that Rockers are self indulgent, irresponsible, and morally bankrupt, Cavallo lets us in on a little secret through the personal letters of rock stars and through media interviews-Rockers worked hard, took pride in their work as professionals and fought for artistic integrity often at the expense of fame and moolah. Hard work and integrity truly lied center stage in 60s Rock & Roll exemplified by rock stars such as Janis Joplin. Joplin masked her middle class determination to be the best female blues vocalist through a regimen of hard work with a boosey-bluesy radical political interpretation of down-home Texas blues. Cavallo demonstrates that it was not only about hard work and professionalism. It was also control about who would control their own music and how to protect it from homogenization by the Robber Barons of the music industry at firms like Capital records. Cavallo examines these struggles through (among others)bios of rockers Neil Young and Bob Dylan--clearly rebels with a cause. But that's not all. Through other bios Cavallo gives us a glimpse of what really went on in the recording studios; continuing to emphasize the brutally hard won independence from musical commercialism through the eyes of Frank Zappa, Gerry Garcia and many other stars.
There's more to come from Cavallo, however, who constantly takes time-out from his 60s tour-de-force to remind us of historical context embedding this decade in the political and social movements of the two preceding centuries. Turning to the origins of radical 60s political thought, Cavallo takes us back to the Constitutional radicals of yesteryear, the Anti Federalists, recovering their debate about the meaning of democracy and the evil inherent in the centralization of power in national government and placing SDS thought and practice smack in the middle. The American version of communal living and independent free will like all forms of life began in the water, in this case the waters of Walden Pond embodied in the social experiments of Emerson and Thoreau. Then there was the fashion statement of the 60s "do your own thing" ( if you recall, it wasn't always pretty and it didn't always smell so good). Appropriating the dress of the 19th century frontier-a combination of cowboys and Indians-from boots and stove-pipe Jeans to long-hair, headbands and fringed leather jackets, 60s radical chic came more from Tombstone than from the English dandies of Barnaby Street. Once again making sense out of nonsense to further support the origins of the frontier fashion statement, Cavallo cleverly merges history with the 1950s western craze that swept television from Gunsmoke to Bonanza. Even the TV show the Untouchables was a western with Italians replacing the Indians and dressing weird too. If ever there was validation that "clothes makes the man" putting on the outfit of a 19th century gunfighter (without the gun) produced a feeling of rugged individualism and rule by conscience the very spirit of 1960s radicalism.
Finally, through the use of biography of 1960s activists, Cavallo explores the many contradictions that riddled 60s radicalism. For example, contrasting the struggle for male independence from the suffocating grip of a "straight" corporate career with their inability to see and to treat women's struggles for independence from men as equally important. Nowhere is the conflict of machismo and feminism more evident than in the mini-biography of Digger Emmett Grogan who befriended an Indian, left San Francisco and wandered off into the wilderness to commune with nature and to get back to his primitive self. While seeking to be the new man, Grogan consistently mistreated his girlfriend limiting her "new" experience to part-time maid and concubine, ultimately shedding her when she no longer suited his needs. In Grogan's quest for purity of purpose, he frequently overlooked the impact of his own behavior on others as he morphed himself into his new, radical desocialized self. Cavallo introduces us to other ultra weirdoes like Grogan's fellow Digger, Peter Coyote, but let me not spill all the beans. Buy this book, Grogan's big adventure alone is worth the price

Click Here to see more reviews about: A Fiction of the Past: The Sixties in American History



Buy Now

Click here for more information about A Fiction of the Past: The Sixties in American History

Read More...

The Sixties Review

The Sixties
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Moments ago this book arrived in the mail. As I sat on my floor and opened it's pages, I came to the photograph of Dorothy Day. I suddenly was overcome and burst into tears. Not from sadness or melancholy or loss, but from the Beauty and Honesty in this picture. It is amazing at a time when we are deluged with images, images that are used to sell and and decieve, to look upon images that merely reveal. Reveal truths which lie in the hearts of men and women. Thank you Richard Avedon ( and Doon Arbus) for following your hearts and making these pictures. For having the faith to pursue them, even if it made no sense to at the time. I feel this book has drawn a line on the wall and said no less than this. As a photographer, as a human being... this book is reminder to find and tell THE TRUTH.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Sixties



Buy Now

Click here for more information about The Sixties

Read More...

There's a Riot Going On: Revolutionaries, Rock Stars, and the Rise and Fall of the '60s Review

There's a Riot Going On: Revolutionaries, Rock Stars, and the Rise and Fall of the '60s
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
In taking a line from The Beach Boys' `Student Demonstration Time'- to name but one reference - as its title, author Doggett makes it clear his massive tome is directed at describing the relationship between what I will call popular music and the multi-headed beast of socio-economic-political action. It's not a new topic, nor is it a topic not already in the consciousness of many - if not most folks. Music has always been a medium discourse - both pro and con. It is also part of the fabric of our lives as a means to expression, both individually and in groups. The issue of what music means - both as a manifestation of our culture and as a tool of change - has also been addressed before; some of Ian Whitcomb's books come to mind immediately.
What Doggett has done is take the period from roughly 1950 to 1975 and provide a narrative history of how music and - more importantly - the musicians were involved in the politics of change taking place. So, it is really much more a story of the music industry and its participants than a history of change.
What we find is not surprising in that those involved, more often than not, had their own agenda. In fact, often these self-interests were at odds or even totally opposed to the events. Bob Dylan never became the anti-war/antiestablishment leader that his iconic stature implied. John Lennon may have sang "Women are the [......] of the world," but his actions indicated that his heart (maybe [....] is a better choice of words) lay in maintaining and enjoying a feminine-servile condition. In fact, Doggett repeatedly complains - to the point of carping - that misogynistic attitudes permeated the music scene and its spillover into politics.
None of this should have been surprising to Doggett or anyone else, for that matter, as books, films, plays, songs, newspaper and reality television have all addressed this issue. Yes, there are exceptions; there always are. But, this period in rock 'n' roll - a period before Heart, Hole, The Runaways, Fanny, The Slits and Madonna - was a male playland.
To make the failure of our music idols to embrace the "revolution" the centerpiece of a book this sprawling is an exercise in the self-obvious. There are better ways to learn about the history of this period. What happenhs here is that the author castigates failure to live up to the dogma and doctrines of revolution. How could you excpect otherwise from a medium like popular music where excess is applauded?


Click Here to see more reviews about: There's a Riot Going On: Revolutionaries, Rock Stars, and the Rise and Fall of the '60s

Between 1965 and 1972, students and other political activists around the globe prepared to mount a revolution. While the Vietnam War raged, calls for black power grew louder and liberation movements erupted everywhere from Berkeley, Detroit, and Newark, to Paris, Berlin, Ghana, and Peking. Rock and soul music fueled this revolutionary movement with anthems and iconic imagery. Soon the musicians themselves, from John Lennon and Bob Dylan to James Brown and Fela Kuti, were being dragged into the fray. Some joined the protestors on the barricades; some were persecuted for their political activism; some abandoned the cause and were dismissed as counter-revolutionaries. From Mick Jagger's legendary appearance in Grosvenor Square, standing on the sidelines and snapping pictures, to the infamous incident at Woodstock when Pete Townshend kicked Yippie Abbie Hoffman off the stage while he tried to make a speech about an imprisoned comrade, to Lennon's display of self-promotion when he auctioned off his hair on top of the "Black House," Doggett unravels the truth about how these ambitious musicians weren't always the "Street Fighting Men" they saw themselves as. There's A Riot Going On is a rich, fact-filled, exceedingly well-researched social history at the nexus of pop culture, celebrity, and politics.

Buy NowGet 11% OFF

Click here for more information about There's a Riot Going On: Revolutionaries, Rock Stars, and the Rise and Fall of the '60s

Read More...